|
|
|
¼ÇöÁÖ ( Seo Hyun-Ju ) - Chungnam National University College of Nursing
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The aim of this article is to provide detailed information on scoping reviews, including definition, relatedprocesses, and differences between scoping reviews and systematic reviews, and to discuss the limitations ofscoping reviews.
Methods: This article briefly introduces the researchers to the purpose of a scoping review,methodological framework and related examples, limitations and useful tips for conducting a scoping review.
Results: A scoping review is a relatively new approach of evidence synthesis that provides an overview/map of theavailable research evidence without generating a summary estimation. Therefore, scoping reviews are particularlyuseful when a body of literature has not yet been comprehensively examined, or has a complex or heterogeneousphenomena unsuitable for conducting systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence.
Conclusion: Becauseof the variability in the methods of performing scoping review, there is a need for methodological standardizationto improve the utility and robustness of review findings.
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
ÁÖÁ¦¹üÀ§ ¹®Çå°íÂû, ¹æ¹ý·Ð, ±Ù°Å±â¹Ý°£È£
Scoping review, Methods, Evidence-based nursing
|
|
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
|
|
|
|
|
|